background image
SUMMER 2007
Co-op America Quarterly
7
7
www.coopamerica.org
Fuels
for
the
Future
WHAT Is IT?:
The same gas that comes through pipes to heat two-thirds of Ameri-
can homes, light stoves, and power water heaters becomes a vehicle
fuel when it is squeezed into cylinders as "compressed natural gas"
(CNG) or chilled until it forms "liquified natural gas" (lNG). Natural
gas is found underground and is mostly methane, with small amounts
of other gases and water vapor. It is formed over centuries when
animals and plants decompose while sealed off from oxygen.
PRos:
·
Natural gas is capable of burning more completely and cleanly
than gasoline, letting out less particulate pollution. Greenhouse gas
emissions are 25 percent lower than gasoline, and each fill-up is
currently cheaper than gasoline.
·
Drivers of cars that are equipped to take CNG can skip the
gas station and refuel at home: A "Phill" unit, which can be purchased
currently in 17 states for about $2,000 and mounts on a garage wall,
allows customers to fuel their cars directly from the natural gas pipes
that heat their homes. (liquified natural gas, by contrast, is used al-
most exclusively for large industrial vehicles.) As for the safety of Phill
units, the manufacturer, FuelMaker Corp. of Toronto, says they have
safety mechanisms that will shut them down if they're not connected
properly or if the system senses a methane leak or other malfunction.
·
Natural gas is a commodity extracted primarily here in North
America, not imported from overseas. (Increased demand could
change this situation, however.)
·
For fleets of buses and trucks, natural gas historically was a much
cleaner choice than diesel. Now, natural gas is losing its edge as cleaner
diesel technologies close the gap between the two fuels, according to
Don Anair at the union of Concerned Scientists. Today, new ultra-low-
sulfur diesel makes it possible to bring particulate matter pollution from
diesel engines down to levels as low as natural gas engines, though older
diesel vehicles require a retrofit filter for this improvement. For the
next few years, natural gas engines still have lower emissions of nitrous
oxides than diesel vehicles, though diesels are expected to reduce that
pollutant to equally good levels by 2010.
CoNs:
·
Natural gas, like petroleum, is a finite, non-renewable resource.
·
Natural gas stations aren't all that easy to find--and there's only
one model of CNG car currently on the market.
·
The CNG storage tank takes up about half of the traditional
trunk space in a CNG passenger vehicle.
·
Though a climate improvement over gas and a climate tie with
ultra-low-sulfur diesel, it's still not the best fuel available when it
comes to reducing emissions.
CuRRENT sTATus:
The uS Department of Energy estimates there is a 60-year supply
of natural gas from conventional sources in the uS, and more than a
200-year supply from advanced technologies and new discoveries.
The Honda Civic GX is the only current passenger car designed
to run on CNG (a previous Ford model was discontinued).
Some experiments are underway to use the methane that rises
up from landfills, sewage, or manure as renewably generated "biogas."
This technique is used widely in developing countries, including India
and Costa Rica, but is still experimental on a municipal level in the uS.
sHoulD you mAkE THE sWITCH?:
No. you can get better mileage and lower emissions more with
other fuels--and better convenience, too. Plus, if you're looking
to be part of a long-term environmental solution that's renewable
indefinitely, CNG isn't it.
Natural gas might be a good intermediate emissions-reduction
step for truck and bus fleets.
If you're looking to be part of a long-term solution
that's renewable indefinitely, natural gas isn't it.
Natural Gas
Verdict:
While natural gas can be a viable short-term emissions-
reducing strategy, especially for fleets, as we work toward
zero-emission cars, there are much better fuels available now, in
terms of environmental impact and personal convenience.
Honda Civic GX
Planes, Trains, and Automobiles
While our transportation recommendations in this issue focus
mainly on passenger cars, trains and planes are definitely part of
our climate-changing mix as well.
Most trains in uS are fueled by diesel. They produce about
0.4 lbs. of CO
2
per passenger, per mile, making them the most
climate-friendly way to travel long distances. As for other
pollutants, the EPA recently announced new rules that will
reduce annual nitrogen oxide emissions (a key ingredient in
smog) from diesel locomotives by 80 percent, and annual soot
emissions by 90 percent.
Airplanes are powered by jet fuel, a petroleum-based fuel
that is similar to kerosene. The climate-changing news here is
bad: One international round trip flight emits nearly as much
CO
2
per passenger as an entire year of driving.
In terms of looking for fuel alternatives, the outlook is more
hopeful for trains than airplanes. Biodiesel blends have been
used successfully in some diesel locomotives, and a greater use
of electric trains promises to reduce emissions (though they
need more renewable energy to power them). For airplanes,
most alternatives being explored for cars, i.e. biodiesel, ethanol,
and hydrogen, are thought to be out of the question due to the
cold, harsh conditions in the upper atmosphere.
Bottom line: Reduce your need for air travel as much as
possible, and consider taking a train instead of driving or flying.
Consider reducing your carbon footprint by offsetting your
travel emissions, no matter what mode of transportation
you choose. See our Real Money article, "Carbon Offsets
Demystified," at www.coopamerica.org/pubs/realmoney/ar-
ticles/carbonoffsets.cfm for more information.